Sample Report
Pacific Glow MedSpa
Market & Demographics Intelligence — Demonstration
Incorrect username or password.
Enter credentials:
pacificglow_96815 / sample2026pacificglow_96815 / sample2026The Honolulu metro trade area surrounding Pacific Glow MedSpa contains an estimated 48,200 women aged 30–65 — the core demographic for aesthetic services. With a median household income of $142,000 in your primary zip code (96815) and 58% holding a bachelor’s degree or higher, this is among the most affluent and educated aesthetic markets in the Pacific region. The total addressable market for aesthetic services in your trade area is estimated at $48M–$72M annually.
Market saturation stands at 1 med spa per 4,017 target customers, which is meaningfully below the national average of 1:3,200. This indicates room for growth without destructive competition — a rare position in 2026 as mainland metros become increasingly crowded. The combination of high disposable income, below-average saturation, and Hawaii’s unique tourism overlay creates a favorable environment for practice expansion and new service line launches.
Several demand shifts are reshaping the Honolulu market: GLP-1 weight management is the fastest-growing procedure category nationally (300%+ YoY), body contouring is surging as a GLP-1 complement, and preventative “baby Botox” is pulling the 25–34 demographic into med spas earlier than ever. Practices that position for these trends now will capture disproportionate market share over the next 12–24 months.
This is the core aesthetic services demographic — women with disposable income, established skincare routines, and the highest propensity to seek injectables, laser treatments, and body contouring. At an average annual spend of $1,000–$1,500 per patient, this represents a total addressable market of $48M–$72M annually.
Target demographic by age band:
Driven by Honolulu’s professional sector growth and military spouse demographics. This cohort enters aesthetics earlier than prior generations — “preventative Botox” and skincare-first treatments. Average annual spend: $800–$1,100. They are the most digitally influenced (Instagram/TikTok-driven decisions) and the least brand-loyal, shopping on convenience and social proof.
This cohort spends an average of $1,200–$1,800 annually on aesthetic services — 50% more than the 30–39 bracket. They are the core consumers of injectables (Botox, filler), laser resurfacing, and increasingly body contouring. They value provider relationships and are more likely to commit to treatment plans and memberships. Lower churn rate: ~15% annually vs. 28% for 30–39.
Average annual spend: $1,000–$1,500. This cohort has the lowest attrition rate (~10% annually) and the highest referral generation (2.4 referrals per patient vs. 1.1 for ages 30–39). They drive revenue through surgical-adjacent procedures: skin tightening, body contouring, advanced laser treatments. They are also the primary consumers of medical-grade skincare retail, adding $200–$400 in annual retail revenue per patient.
We define the trade area as a 15-mile / 25-minute drive-time radius from Pacific Glow MedSpa (96815). Female population 30–65 is sourced from ACS 5-year estimates (2020–2024). Spend estimates use ASAPS/AmSpa 2025 consumer survey data adjusted for Hawaii cost of living (+18%). The $48M–$72M range reflects penetration rates of 22–33% (the share of target women who actively use aesthetic services).
Detailed breakdown of the 5 primary zip codes in Pacific Glow’s trade area. Your practice location (96815 Waikiki) is highlighted. These zip codes collectively contain 31,800 target women — 66% of the total trade area.
| Zip | Area | Population | Median HHI | Bachelor’s+ | Target Women 30–65 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96815 | Waikiki | 35,400 | $142,000 | 62% | 8,200 |
| 96814 | Ala Moana | 28,600 | $98,000 | 55% | 6,800 |
| 96822 | Manoa | 22,100 | $118,000 | 72% | 5,400 |
| 96816 | Kaimuki | 31,200 | $85,000 | 48% | 7,100 |
| 96813 | Downtown | 19,800 | $76,000 | 58% | 4,300 |
Highest median HHI ($142K), second-highest education rate (62%), and the largest target population (8,200). The combination of affluent residents and tourist foot traffic makes this the single most valuable zip code in the Honolulu aesthetic market. Your physical presence here is a significant strategic advantage.
72% bachelor’s+ is the highest in the trade area — driven by University of Hawaii proximity and established family neighborhoods. Median HHI of $118K is strong. With 5,400 target women and only 1 med spa serving this zip, Manoa represents the most attractive expansion or marketing target. These women are research-driven and respond to credentialing and clinical evidence in marketing.
The second-largest target population (7,100 women) with more moderate HHI ($85K). This zip is more price-sensitive but has growing demand for entry-level aesthetic services — microneedling, chemical peels, and preventative Botox. Two med spas currently serve this area. A membership or package-pricing model would resonate here.
We also analyzed 96825 (Hawaii Kai East), 96821 (Hawaii Kai), and 96818 (Pearl Harbor/Aliamanu). Combined, these add 16,400 target women to the trade area. Notably, 96825 has zero med spas serving 3,800 target women with $145K median HHI — a significant whitespace opportunity within 20 minutes of Pacific Glow.
The national average is 1 med spa per 3,200 target customers. Honolulu’s 25% lower saturation means existing practices have room to grow patient volume without intense head-to-head competition. Island geography also creates natural barriers to new entrants — limiting the competition pipeline that plagues open-border mainland markets.
Saturation benchmarks vs. comparable markets:
Saturation by zip code:
| Zip | Area | Target Women | Med Spas | Ratio | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96815 | Waikiki | 8,200 | 4 | 1:2,050 | Competitive |
| 96814 | Ala Moana | 6,800 | 3 | 1:2,267 | Competitive |
| 96822 | Manoa | 5,400 | 1 | 1:5,400 | Underserved |
| 96816 | Kaimuki | 7,100 | 2 | 1:3,550 | Favorable |
| 96813 | Downtown | 4,300 | 2 | 1:2,150 | Competitive |
Unlike mainland markets where a competitor can open 2 miles across a county line, Oahu’s island geography creates a natural moat. The pool of qualified aesthetic providers willing to relocate to Hawaii is small, real estate is constrained, and the market is too small for most PE-backed roll-up strategies. This structural advantage protects existing practices from the rapid saturation seen in Scottsdale, Austin, and South Florida.
Your home zip has a 1:2,050 ratio — actually above the national average for saturation. The premium addresses and tourist traffic attract competitors. However, your 4.9-star rating and 284 reviews give you the strongest reputation moat among the 4 providers in this zip. The key risk is LaserAway’s corporate marketing budget capturing price-sensitive and first-time patients.
Only 1 med spa serving 5,400 target women (1:5,400 ratio). The existing provider is a wellness hybrid with limited injectable capabilities. A dedicated marketing campaign targeting 96822 — or a satellite office — could capture significant share with minimal competitive friction.
After adjusting for Hawaii’s 18% cost-of-living premium, the effective disposable income in Waikiki still exceeds most mainland aesthetic markets. Aesthetic services are classified as “affordable luxury” in this income bracket — recurring, budgeted, and resistant to minor economic downturns.
Income distribution across trade area:
Honolulu households in the $120K–$160K bracket allocate approximately 4.2% of after-tax income to personal care services, vs. the national average of 3.1%. This translates to approximately $3,200–$4,800/year per household available for aesthetic services. At the household level, this includes spend across all members — but the primary aesthetic consumer (women 30–65) typically captures 70–85% of this allocation.
Hawaii’s cost of living is 18% above the national average (housing +35%, groceries +15%, transportation +12%). A $142K household in Honolulu has the purchasing power equivalent of approximately $120K on the mainland. This is still well above the $95K threshold where aesthetic spending becomes “routine” rather than “occasional.” However, it means Honolulu patients are more price-aware than their raw income suggests — value messaging and membership models resonate here.
68% of target women in the trade area live in dual-income households, vs. 58% nationally. This creates more resilient aesthetic spending: even during economic slowdowns, dual-income households reduce frequency but rarely discontinue aesthetic treatments entirely. Retention rates for dual-income patients average 82% vs. 64% for single-income households.
Four procedure categories are reshaping the Honolulu aesthetic market. Practices that position for these trends now will capture disproportionate patient volume over the next 12–24 months.
The fastest-growing category in aesthetic medicine. Semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro/Zepbound) are driving a massive wave of patients into med spas for the first time. These patients then become downstream consumers of body contouring (loose skin), facial rejuvenation (volume loss), and ongoing aesthetic maintenance. In Honolulu, 3 competitors have already launched GLP-1 programs. Pacific Glow has not entered this category. The window for early-mover advantage is closing — estimated 12–18 months before saturation in this service line.
CoolSculpting, EmSculpt, and Morpheus8 Body are surging as the natural complement to GLP-1 weight loss. Patients losing 15–30% body weight often experience loose skin and desire body sculpting. This creates a two-stage revenue pipeline: GLP-1 monthly recurring revenue ($350–$550/month) followed by body contouring packages ($3,000–$8,000). Hawaii’s beach-and-resort culture amplifies demand for body aesthetics beyond mainland norms.
Quick, minimal-downtime treatments are capturing the 30–39 demographic: microneedling ($250–$450), hydrafacials ($175–$300), lip flip ($150–$250), baby Botox (10–15 units, $160–$280). These patients book during lunch breaks or between meetings. The margin per minute is lower, but they serve as the gateway into higher-value treatments and build long-term patient relationships. In Honolulu, the Ala Moana and Downtown corridors are ideal for lunchtime positioning.
A growing segment of women ages 25–34 are entering aesthetic medicine earlier than any prior generation, driven by social media education and the normalization of preventative care. “Baby Botox” (5–15 units, $100–$200) is the entry point. This is significant for lifetime patient value: a patient acquired at 28 has an estimated LTV of $35,000–$55,000 vs. $12,000–$18,000 for a patient acquired at 48. While outside the core 30–65 target, this trend is expanding the total addressable market by an estimated 8–12%.
Based on Google Trends search volume, Honolulu over-indexes on: hydrafacial (+34%), lip filler (+22%), and laser hair removal (+18%) vs. national averages. It under-indexes on: CoolSculpting (-12%) and EmSculpt (-8%), likely due to lower device availability on-island. This suggests unmet demand for body contouring that existing providers are not fully capturing.
How Honolulu patients discover and choose their med spa. Understanding the multi-touch journey is critical for allocating marketing spend effectively.
Primary discovery channels (% of patients who cite each channel):
The average Honolulu aesthetic patient interacts with 3.4 channels before making their first appointment. A typical journey: (1) Google search for a procedure, (2) review provider profiles and photos, (3) check Instagram for before/after results, (4) ask a friend or colleague for validation. Practices visible across all channels convert at 2.8x the rate of those visible on Google alone.
This includes Google Maps (Local Pack), organic search, and Google Ads. The Local Pack captures 42% of clicks for local service searches. Pacific Glow currently appears in only 2 of 7 tracked Local Pack keywords — meaning you are invisible to the majority of Google-sourced patients. Fixing Google Business Profile optimization is the single highest-ROI action available (see our Search & Digital Visibility Audit for the full breakdown).
Honolulu’s “island community” culture makes word-of-mouth 46% more influential than mainland markets. Your 50–65 cohort generates 2.4 referrals per patient. However, this channel is impossible to scale without a structured referral program. A $50–$100 credit for referrals that convert would formalize this natural advantage. Currently, none of Pacific Glow’s competitors have a visible referral program.
24% overall, but 41% of patients aged 30–39 cite Instagram as a discovery or validation channel. They search location tags (#honolulumedspa, #waikikibeauty), view before/after content, and assess the practice’s aesthetic “vibe.” Pacific Glow’s 2,180 Instagram followers is mid-range. Your closest competitor, Aloha Med Spa, has 3,400 followers with higher engagement rates despite fewer patients.
Approximately 2.1 million visitors come to Waikiki annually, many of them affluent women who book aesthetic treatments during vacation. Tourist patients discover through: hotel concierge referrals (untapped), Google “botox near me” searches from mobile, and Instagram geo-tags. They are less price-sensitive, do not comparison-shop, and represent incremental revenue that no mainland competitor can replicate. Creating vacation-specific packages and landing pages would capture this channel.
Hawaii’s regulatory environment for aesthetic medicine. Understanding these requirements is essential for expansion planning and risk management.
All med spas in Hawaii must operate under the supervision of a licensed physician (MD or DO). The Hawaii Board of Medical Examiners, under the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA), oversees medical practice licensing. Medical director requirements: must be licensed in Hawaii, must have a supervisory agreement on file, and must be available for consultation during operating hours. The board has increased enforcement activity in 2024–2025, particularly around scope of practice and advertising claims.
Hawaii grants APRNs (Advanced Practice Registered Nurses) full practice authority — one of 27 states with this designation. APRNs can diagnose, prescribe, and perform procedures independently after a post-graduate transition period. This is a significant operational advantage: Pacific Glow’s APRN-led model is fully compliant and does not require on-site physician presence for most aesthetic procedures. However, certain procedures (surgical, deep chemical peels, laser Class IV) may still require physician supervision depending on the specific protocol.
If Pacific Glow enters the GLP-1 weight management category, additional compliance steps are required: (1) the prescribing provider must have completed obesity medicine CME, (2) Hawaii requires a documented medical assessment including BMI, comorbidities, and contraindication screening, (3) compounded semaglutide is under FDA scrutiny — recommend using only FDA-approved branded products (Wegovy, Zepbound) to avoid enforcement risk, (4) telemedicine prescribing is permitted in Hawaii but requires an established patient relationship.
The DCCA issued 4 disciplinary actions against aesthetic providers in Hawaii in 2024–2025: 2 for scope of practice violations (RN performing procedures without supervisory agreement), 1 for misleading advertising claims (“guaranteed results”), and 1 for operating without proper facility registration. The trend is toward stricter enforcement, particularly around: unlicensed personnel performing injectable procedures, social media advertising claims, and before/after photo compliance.
Based on our review: (1) Medical director supervisory agreement — verify current and on file with DCCA, (2) APRN collaborative agreement — confirm transition period completed, (3) Facility registration — ensure current with DCCA, (4) OSHA compliance for laser/injectable procedures, (5) HIPAA compliance including social media consent forms for before/after photos, (6) Advertising compliance — no “guaranteed” outcome claims, required disclaimers on before/after images, (7) Insurance — verify medical malpractice coverage includes all procedures offered.
Based on the demographic and market data in this report, here are the 4 highest-impact strategic recommendations for Pacific Glow MedSpa.
Manoa has the highest education rate (72% bachelor’s+), strong income ($118K HHI), and 5,400 target women served by only 1 limited-capability provider. Launch geo-targeted Google Ads and Instagram ads to 96822, emphasizing clinical credentials and evidence-based results (this cohort responds to data over aesthetics). Create a landing page optimized for “med spa near Manoa” and “botox Manoa Honolulu.” Estimated patient capture: 15–25 new patients/month from this zip alone at $0.40–$0.80 CPA.
High Impact / Low CostThree competitors have already entered this 300%+ growth category. The GLP-1 patient pipeline creates two revenue streams: monthly medication management ($350–$550/month recurring) and downstream body contouring/facial rejuvenation as patients lose weight. Hawaii’s high HHI and health-conscious culture make this market ideal. Use FDA-approved products only (not compounded) to avoid regulatory risk. Revenue potential: $15K–$25K/month within 6 months at 30–50 active patients. The downstream contouring revenue adds another $8K–$15K/month by month 12.
High Impact / Revenue GrowthHonolulu’s 2.1M annual visitors represent an $8–$12M addressable market that no competitor is explicitly targeting. Create “Vacation Glow” packages bundling 2–3 quick-recovery treatments (HydraFacial + lip flip + brow Botox) at a slight premium. Build dedicated landing pages for “botox waikiki vacation,” “facial near hotel waikiki.” Partner with 3–5 luxury hotel concierge desks for referrals. Tourist patients pay premium prices, require no long-term retention investment, and generate social media content organically (vacation photos post-treatment). Estimated incremental revenue: $8K–$15K/month.
Medium Impact / DifferentiationHonolulu’s word-of-mouth rate is 38% vs. 26% nationally — your patients are already referring, but without incentive or tracking. Implement a simple referral program: $75 credit for the referrer, $50 off first treatment for the new patient. Track via unique referral codes. Your 50–65 cohort generates 2.4 referrals/patient naturally; with a formal program, this can reach 3.5–4.0. At 284 active reviewer-patients, a referral program could generate 40–60 new patients in the first 90 days at a CAC of $75 — vs. $180–$250 for Google Ads acquisition.
High Impact / Low CostImplementing all 4 recommendations targets the specific market segments and geographic gaps identified in this report. Combined estimated impact: $45K–$80K in additional monthly revenue within 12 months. The Manoa geo-targeting (#1) and GLP-1 launch (#2) are the highest-confidence estimates, accounting for approximately 65% of the projected upside. Total implementation cost: $3,000–$6,000 (primarily GLP-1 program setup and initial ad spend).
You just previewed our Market & Demographics Intelligence report. Imagine what we can uncover about your specific market, zip codes, and growth opportunities. Each report is custom-built using verified Census, BLS, and proprietary data — no templates, no generic advice.
Diana Chen — Market Intelligence Analyst
SAMPLE REPORT. This report was created with fictional data for demonstration purposes. All business names, demographic figures, market statistics, and strategic recommendations are illustrative. Your actual report will contain real, verified data sourced from U.S. Census ACS, BLS, state licensing databases, and proprietary demand models specific to your market and practice.
AesthetEdge reports use publicly available information including U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Maps, state licensing databases, and proprietary market sizing models. AesthetEdge is an independent market intelligence firm with no affiliation with any competitor.